Performance wise, is it more interesting to connect a queue receiver across a WAN to a TIBCO Enterprise Message Service (EMS) server, or to setup two TIBCO EMS servers on each side and connect them using a route?
Article ID: KB0086016
Updated On:
| Products | Versions |
|---|---|
| TIBCO Enterprise Message Service | - |
| Not Applicable | - |
Description
Resolution:
The protocol between servers is optimized to perform well in a WAN environment.
The protocol between a server and a consumer depends on the acknowledgement mode. For instance auto_ack mode or client_ack mode (if acking each message) are not well-suited to a WAN environment because of the round-trip times. dups_ok would perform better in a WAN but probably still not as well as server to server.
The protocol between servers is optimized to perform well in a WAN environment.
The protocol between a server and a consumer depends on the acknowledgement mode. For instance auto_ack mode or client_ack mode (if acking each message) are not well-suited to a WAN environment because of the round-trip times. dups_ok would perform better in a WAN but probably still not as well as server to server.
Issue/Introduction
Performance wise, is it more interesting to connect a queue receiver across a WAN to a TIBCO Enterprise Message Service (EMS) server, or to setup two TIBCO EMS servers on each side and connect them using a route?
Feedback
Yes
No
Powered by
